 |
Business Directory |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Coupons |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Classifieds |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Author | Messages | |
meistersinger
Posts:0

 | | 04/29/2008 2:05 PM |
Alert | I heard a rumor today that Huntsville's City Planner, Stan Hamrick, resigned and is headed to Maricopa. Anybody have any firm information on this? I was told that one of his forte's is declaring prime commercial property as "economically distressed" so that tax money could be redirected to developers and landowners. He should do well in Maricopa.
| | | |
| | mrwonderful
Posts:254

 | | 04/29/2008 2:17 PM |
Alert | | Hey azcarcarrier is in Conroe Texas and he will head to the City Hall office to find out any information.... He will keep us posted!! Its 4:15 there now. | | | |
|
| | JoeMan
Posts:64

 | | 04/30/2008 11:34 AM |
Alert | I say bring on Stan so he can help the city take over azcarcarrier’s "economically distressed" land and increase economic development in Maricopa. Lol
You do have lots of land to give away, right, Mr. Jaynes?
| | | |
|
| | azcarcarrier
Posts:295

 | | 04/30/2008 12:44 PM |
Alert | | Well Joe Man and Big Mean Jim Green evey thing is for sale for a price. I have dealt with the Rio Salado Improvement Project in Tempe and Scottsdale, so bring on the new "NO BRAINER"city management. I sure wish you many fruitful returns on the great deals available in the city of Maricopa. | | | |
|
| | gilbertglcn
Posts:208


 | | 04/30/2008 1:12 PM |
Alert | | As the Planner position was eliminated due to budget constraints, it would be illegal to fill the position again, yes evn in Arizona, at this point in time. Besides, since there is no opening posted, how could the City Council allow the City Manager to hire anyone without go through the legal hiring process? Maybe this is a question for Mr. Haddad, and his forum posting prior to election. Unless the Council wants another lawsuit, they eliminated Amy H's position due to budget cuts, so it is not like they can hire anyone to replace her, or even hire additional people in that dept., without lying to the community, and breaking the law. | | | |
|
| | TheSmokingGun
Posts:0

 | | 04/30/2008 1:18 PM |
Alert | | Gilbert, how is it illegal? Show me the law. Put up or shut up. | | | |
|
| | JoeMan
Posts:64

 | | 04/30/2008 5:17 PM |
Alert | my comment was in just for fun
it sounded like another conspiracy starting to me | | | |
|
| | gilbertglcn
Posts:208


 | | 05/01/2008 8:17 AM |
Alert | The City of Maricopa's personnel rules are very specific when it comes to how to handle staff cut in budgetary constraints. The City requirements, if not met, would enable anyone was let go to budget cuts, and not brought back, per the personnel rules to sue the city for the city's failure to handle the situation per the city procedures.
Since the City has publically stated that Amy was let go for budgetary and not any performance related issues, then the City must handle both her position and the Fire Chief's position, as City rules and procedures mandate. Failure to do that, again, opens them up for litigation, and we have already seen what that cost the taxpayers. | | | |
|
| | akflyer
Posts:54

 | | 05/01/2008 8:52 AM |
Alert | gilbertglcn,
Acts that may expose you to litigation may not be wise, but they are not necessarily illegal. Can you please elaborate on why you say it would be illegal in this case? | | | |
|
| | gilbertglcn
Posts:208


 | | 05/01/2008 10:14 AM |
Alert | Two reasons - Arizona Dept of Labor regulations, once a layoff situation occurs, kick in. Even if the layoff is just two staff people, it is a layoff, and there are certain steps that must be taken after a layoff, such as if the position is opened again, the initial offer goes to the one who vacated the position to begin with. Also, since the City is a public entity, it must advertise available positions, either allowing for internal promotions to fill the opening, or competetive external postings. The city has not had any openings in Planning, so there could not be a position to fill.
Further, since the City absolutely claims budget problems, there is no way another staff person could be hired, expecially without posting the opening on the web site, as has been the practice of the City with other openings. | | | |
|
| | akflyer
Posts:54

 | | 05/01/2008 5:53 PM |
Alert | | Thanks for the reply gilbertglcn. Do you happen to know the citation for that AZ Dept of Labor regulation? I am curious for research on another issue not directly related to this thread. | | | |
|
| | azcarcarrier
Posts:295

 | | 05/01/2008 9:11 PM |
Alert | Mr. Miesterbrau you need to find another source of information, you now have been labeled "worthless source" I spoke with Stan Hamrick while in Conroe and enjoying a nice day fishing on Lake Livingston. He filled me in on a few other items, so enjoy and proceed with your sleezey tabloid stories. By the name changing only creates more questions? lol | | | |
|
| | allseeingeye
Posts:9


 | | 05/01/2008 9:36 PM |
Alert | The following link might kill this thread. http://www.itemonline.com/local/local_story_123000445.html But this could probably spark a whole new one. I believe it was posted before city code 3-3-2 Conditions of Employment http://www.maricopa-az.gov/web/documents/Code/Chapter3.pdf which approves the merit system in which the city clearly defines layoffs in its personnel handbook. These codes are law and a violation would therefore make it illegal. 8.2.1 Layoff Instances a) A layoff may occur when one or more of the following conditions exist: lack of work or funds, abolition of position, changes in duties, contractual or technological changes, business necessity, or other appropriate reasons as determined by the City Manager. b) When it becomes necessary to reduce the City employment without cause on the part of the employee, the City Manager shall determine the number of positions and the position classification series in which the reductions shall take place, taking into account the nature of functions to be performed, public safety and impact on service levels, and merit service. c) A minimum of forty-five (45) calendar days notice shall be provided to any employee targeted for layoff. d) The written notice shall be hand-delivered or sent by certified mail. A copy shall be sent to the Department Head. e) The notice shall inform the employee of the effective date of layoff and of the pre-layoff re-appointment and reinstatement procedures. f) Provisional and temporary appointments shall not be filled without first contacting the Human Capital Manager in an effort to fill the position by qualifying employees who have been or are scheduled for separation due to reduction in force. 8.2.2 Layoff Determination a) When any classification is subject to layoff, new provisional or temporary employees in that classification in the same Department shall be terminated before any regular status employee is laid off. b) When regular status employees in a classification become subject to layoff, the Human Capital Manager, Department Director, or designee shall determine which employee(s) shall be laid off based on the performance, conduct, qualifications, seniority, and merit service of all regular status employees in that classification in the same department. The weighing of criteria will be determined by the City Manager. 8.2.3 Pre-Layoff Reappointment a) Following receipt of notice of layoff, and before effective date of layoff, any appointing authority in the City having a vacant position of the same or lower salary grade for which the employee meets the minimum qualifications may consider the employee for a noncompetitive appointment. b) If the employee wishes to seek a pre-layoff reappointment, the employee shall submit a request in writing to the Human Capital Manager or designee specifying the classification of the vacancy, and the department having the vacancy of interest, along with a completed application form. c) If the Department Director determines that the employee meets the minimum qualifications for the classification of the vacancy, then the appointing authority shall promptly interview the employee. An offer of reappointment is at the discretion of the Department Director. d) A pre-layoff reappointment shall be effective on or before the date on which the layoff would have been effective, so that a break in service does not occur. e) The employee shall retain all accrued sick leave, annual leave, and compensatory time upon pre-layoff reappointment. f) If the employee subject to layoff is offered and accepts a pre-layoff reappointment, then the employee forfeits the right to be placed on the layoff list. g) If the employee is not offered or does not accept an offer of pre-layoff reappointment, on or before the effective date of the layoff, then the employee shall be laid off. 8.2.4 Pre-Layoff Reappointment Salary Determination a) Upon a pre-layoff reappointment, if the employee’s current salary falls on a current step in the range of the new position, the employee shall be transferred with no loss in pay. b) If the current salary exceeds the range of the new position, the salary shall be set at the maximum of the range of the new position. 8.2.5 Layoff List a) Names of laid-off employees are kept on a layoff list for two (2) years. Employees rehired from a layoff list, who return to their previously held position or a position in the same class, shall return to their rate of pay at the time they were laid off, with cost of living adjustments being the only factor for adjustment. When a position becomes available, the City will make a reasonable effort to notify employees on a layoff list. However, it is the employee’s responsibility to apply for any position the employee did not occupy at the time of their layoff. 8.2.6 Employee Rights a) Employees who believe they were selected for lay-off for any reason other than merit service may appeal their selection to the Department Manager or designee, in consultation with the Human Capital Manager, within five (5) days of receipt of their lay-off notice. I'm not sure if any of this occured in the instance of the Planning Director or the Fire Chief but I'm still keeping my eye out.
City of Maricopa Personnel Policies and Procedures | | | |
|
| | TheSmokingGun
Posts:0

 | | 05/02/2008 8:39 AM |
Alert | Bruce is wrong. Again. | | | |
|
| | azcarcarrier
Posts:295

 | | 05/02/2008 9:23 AM |
Alert | | Dam things must be getting restless in the BIG town of Maricopa!!! | | | |
|
| | Jim_Green
Posts:30

 | | 05/02/2008 11:39 AM |
Alert | Posted By azcarcarrier on 04/30/2008 12:44 PM
Well Joe Man and Big Mean Jim Green evey thing is for sale for a price. I have dealt with the Rio Salado Improvement Project in Tempe and Scottsdale, so bring on the new "NO BRAINER"city management. I sure wish you many fruitful returns on the great deals available in the city of Maricopa.
I don't even know what this quote means. Are we supposed to be impressed by some dealings with Rio Salado in Tempe and Scottsdale? You are a mess, man!
| | | |
|
| | azcarcarrier
Posts:295

 | | 05/02/2008 12:35 PM |
Alert | Well Jimbo and Joemama I just want you too be aware your wants of Mr. Hamrick can be handled very easily. I got a good training on the ins and outs of city requirements. Please feel free to make the condem, expand, or improve my meek financial existence. You big hitter's I always respect, since I'm just and ole country boy. Guess we'll see what is going on this tuesday, so hope you attend. | | | |
|
| | JoeMan
Posts:64

 | | 05/02/2008 4:51 PM |
Alert | | What???????????? azcarcarrier, did you go to school at all? | | | |
|
| |
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.6 |
|
|
|