missPolitick
Posts:604


 | | 02/06/2008 2:45 PM |
Alert | Posted By RichTig on 02/06/2008 1:10 PM Hallelujah and Praise jesus. I would like to commend god for: avocados (next time make the pit smaller) boobies the color green porn and the internet, which goes with porn
Sound a little UNEVOLVED. Ewww. | | Despite All My Rage I Am Still Just A Rat In A Cage | |
|
|
|
hastings1066
Posts:653


 | | 02/06/2008 2:55 PM |
Alert | | Just did a quick search on line. In Live Science mag - Aug 11, 2005 issue " About two-thirds of scientists believe in God, according to a new survey...". The article goes on to give %s from studies at Rice University and the University of Chicago. There were some differences based on the type of science. Disclamer - I do not know if the site is an advocacy one, but the studies seem real. | | | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 2:57 PM |
Alert | are you telling me that there are no colleges in the SE and that's why Huckabee did so good? man am I getting good at being Jason or what.
anyway, Obama didn't run against Huckabee so there's really no reason to try to answer that.
| | | |
|
|
|
ken
Posts:504


 | | 02/06/2008 3:10 PM |
Alert | | There are plenty of colleges in the SE and thats one reason Obama did so well there. As for being Jason... no your not getting good at being Jason... Jason has his head on straight. Clearly you do not. | | "Knowledge is often mistaken for intelligence. This is like mistaking a cup of milk for a cow." -- Unknown | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 3:17 PM |
Alert | Obama did well coast to coast.
Aren't the republicans the more conserative evangelicals? That might explain Huckabees success in the SE, that and the lack of formal education.
as for my head, god did it. Sorry. | | | |
|
|
|
ken
Posts:504


 | | 02/06/2008 3:31 PM |
Alert | | Obama's lack of substance and his mass appeal on college campuses just goes to show you how much brainwashing really goes on at college campuses. Why do you think so many young people are liberal? They are in the midst of brainwashing. It is only once individuals get a bit older does the brainwashing start to fade and they get their opinions back. | | "Knowledge is often mistaken for intelligence. This is like mistaking a cup of milk for a cow." -- Unknown | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 3:40 PM |
Alert | it's only as one gets older that they open their eyes and leave the church, or they continue to get brainwashed and need to rely on god as the answer to their questions.
ps: I'm not a liberal. | | | |
|
|
|
ken
Posts:504


 | | 02/06/2008 3:57 PM |
Alert | | Many do leave the church when they are young adults... but it is due to the cultural brainwashing... it is only those that can break free of it that end up coming back. If you don't think there is brainwashing going on in Universities around the country your non-liberal self will be sadly surprised when the indoctrination moves beyond religious persecution and starts hitting you in your pocket book. | | "Knowledge is often mistaken for intelligence. This is like mistaking a cup of milk for a cow." -- Unknown | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 4:00 PM |
Alert | | Ken, you my friend are a scarecrow. | | | |
|
|
|
missPolitick
Posts:604


 | | 02/06/2008 4:04 PM |
Alert | | Ken, you're right. It is such a subtle, slow, brainwash that it's difficult to notice. | | Despite All My Rage I Am Still Just A Rat In A Cage | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 4:08 PM |
Alert | it probably starts in Sunday school, and ends (hopefully) when people are old enough to think for themselves.
| | | |
|
|
|
hastings1066
Posts:653


 | | 02/06/2008 4:14 PM |
Alert | Sad. What was a great debate is now a yes it is, no it isn't spat. | | | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/06/2008 4:18 PM |
Alert | | agreed. | | | |
|
|
|
Jason
Posts:3372


 | | 02/07/2008 2:51 PM |
Alert | Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 10:18 AM Posted By Jason on 02/06/2008 10:02 AM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 9:04 AM Posted By hastings1066 on 02/05/2008 10:25 PM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/05/2008 8:11 PM it's always been here in one form or another. It has to have been, because there is no way god would break one of the laws of physics that he created (according to ID) and made it from nothing. It would be kind of hypocritical for him to break his own laws wouldn't it? So, if matter has always been and can't be explaned, is that not as big a mystery as the existence of God? NO, it's not, not even close. The physical world and physical universe can seen, measured, and tested. The existence of god cannot. And the measurements say that the physical universe cannot have existed forever. People say religious people are illogical...  Why is it hard to accept that there exists something that you haven't measured yet, so you don't know what rules it is bound to, yet so easy to accept that the universe has always existed, breaking one of its fundamental rules? Makes no sense. How is having an eternal universe breaking a fundamental rule?
The Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Saying God created everything breaks a whole lot more rules/laws of physics than anything immaginable.
Something that operates outside the box should be able to set and change the rules of the box, no? The universe itself, with no intelligence cannot spontaneously change the laws it operates under right?
Yes our current universe is only 13.6B years old, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one before that, or that after all the stars burn out in 30B years or so it all won't start again.
There's no evidence to show that any of your claims will or have happened. So why is it more believable that the universe changes its laws as it pleases (even though there it has no intelligence) than there existing something with intelligence that has the blueprints and controls to change the laws? | | Joined: Jul 2005 | |
|
|
|
Jason
Posts:3372


 | | 02/07/2008 2:54 PM |
Alert | Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 2:06 PM And before Ken or Jason brings up their view that education level has no bearing on believing in god, take a look at this. http://www.discovergis.com/images/Map/Gallery/INS/edu9.gif Funny, isn't that where Huckabee had success last night? What was the sampling population? What were the sampling controls? What year was the sample done? Your map means nothing without supporting data. | | Joined: Jul 2005 | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/07/2008 6:54 PM |
Alert | Posted By Jason on 02/07/2008 2:51 PM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 10:18 AM Posted By Jason on 02/06/2008 10:02 AM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 9:04 AM Posted By hastings1066 on 02/05/2008 10:25 PM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/05/2008 8:11 PM
it's always been here in one form or another. It has to have been, because there is no way god would break one of the laws of physics that he created (according to ID) and made it from nothing. It would be kind of hypocritical for him to break his own laws wouldn't it?
So, if matter has always been and can't be explaned, is that not as big a mystery as the existence of God?
NO, it's not, not even close. The physical world and physical universe can seen, measured, and tested. The existence of god cannot.
And the measurements say that the physical universe cannot have existed forever. People say religious people are illogical...
Why is it hard to accept that there exists something that you haven't measured yet, so you don't know what rules it is bound to, yet so easy to accept that the universe has always existed, breaking one of its fundamental rules? Makes no sense.
How is having an eternal universe breaking a fundamental rule?
The Second Law of Thermodynamics. How? In what way? Funny how you believe in the 2nd law of thermodynamics, but not the laws of conservation.
Saying God created everything breaks a whole lot more rules/laws of physics than anything immaginable.
Something that operates outside the box should be able to set and change the rules of the box, no? The universe itself, with no intelligence cannot spontaneously change the laws it operates under right? Again, a very convenient answer providing no substance or critical thinking at all.
Yes our current universe is only 13.6B years old, but that doesn't mean there wasn't one before that, or that after all the stars burn out in 30B years or so it all won't start again.
There's no evidence to show that any of your claims will or have happened. So why is it more believable that the universe changes its laws as it pleases (even though there it has no intelligence) than there existing something with intelligence that has the blueprints and controls to change the laws?
There is evidence of the this Universe being 13.6B years old. The past and future universes are just ideas I have that can't be proven. Sound familiar?
| | | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/07/2008 7:09 PM |
Alert | Posted By Jason on 02/07/2008 2:54 PM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 2:06 PM
And before Ken or Jason brings up their view that education level has no bearing on believing in god, take a look at this.
http://www.discovergis.com/images/Map/Gallery/INS/edu9.gif
Funny, isn't that where Huckabee had success last night?
What was the sampling population? What were the sampling controls? What year was the sample done? Your map means nothing without supporting data.
Sampling controls?? What kind of controls can there be or are you just trying to sound scientific?
| | | |
|
|
|
8DaysDazed
Posts:81

 | | 02/08/2008 9:27 AM |
Alert | Ken, you're right. Brainwashing only happens at Universities.
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1052/1052_01.asp
| | | |
|
|
|
Jason
Posts:3372


 | | 02/08/2008 5:40 PM |
Alert | Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/07/2008 7:09 PM Posted By Jason on 02/07/2008 2:54 PM Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/06/2008 2:06 PM
And before Ken or Jason brings up their view that education level has no bearing on believing in god, take a look at this.
http://www.discovergis.com/images/Map/Gallery/INS/edu9.gif
Funny, isn't that where Huckabee had success last night?
What was the sampling population? What were the sampling controls? What year was the sample done? Your map means nothing without supporting data.
Sampling controls?? What kind of controls can there be or are you just trying to sound scientific?
What, did you think that they talked to every single person? No, they took a sample of the population. Now the questions are:
A) Who did they talk to? This is the sampling population. B) What are the controls on the sampling? These rules define how the sampling is conducted and results are compiled. C) What ages are invovled? This goes back to the sampling population. If you sample only old people in the south and only young adults in the west, you'll definitely skew the results (because higher education wasn't as available to are oldest members of society). And finally you forgot the most important point: Corellation != Causation. If all this sounds scientific, it should. Because it is. Game. Set. Match.  | | Joined: Jul 2005 | |
|
|
|
Jason
Posts:3372


 | | 02/08/2008 5:47 PM |
Alert | Posted By 8DaysDazed on 02/08/2008 9:27 AM
Ken, you're right. Brainwashing only happens at Universities.
http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/1052/1052_01.asp
Brainwashing can happen at both universities and churches. I don't think Ken was talking in absolutes.
| | Joined: Jul 2005 | |
|
|
|