 |
Business Directory |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Coupons |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Classifieds |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Author | Messages | |
Java Lover
Posts:170


 | | 09/04/2008 6:04 PM |
Alert | A young woman was about to finish her first year of college. Like so many others her age, she considered herself to be a very liberal Democrat, and was very much in favor of 'the redistribution of wealth.' She was deeply ashamed that her father was a rather staunch Republican, a feeling she openly expressed. Based on the lectures
that she had participated in, and the occasional chat with a professor, she felt that her father had for years harbored an evil, selfish desire to keep what he thought should be his. One day she was challenging her father on his opposition to higher taxes on the rich and the addition of more government welfare
programs. The self-professed objectivity proclaimed by her professors had to be the truth and she indicated so to her father. He responded by asking how she was doing in school. Taken back, she answered rather haughtily that she had a 4.0 GPA, and let him know that it was tough to maintain, insisting that she was taking a very difficult course load and was constantly studying, which left her no time to go out and party like other people she knew. She didn't even have time for a boyfriend, and didn't really have many college friends because she spent all her time studying. Her father listened and then asked, 'How is your friend Audrey doing?' She replied, 'Audrey is barely getting by. All she takes are easy classes, she never studies, and she barely has a 2.0 GPA. She is so popular on campus; college for her is a blast. She's always invited to all the parties, and lots of times she doesn't even show up for classes because she's too hung over.' Her wise father asked his daughter, 'Why don't you go to the Dean's office and ask him to deduct a 1.0 off your GPA and give it
to your friend who only has a 2.0. That way you will both have a 3.0 GPA and certainly that would be a fair and equal distribution of GPA.' The daughter, visibly shocked by her father's suggestion, angrily fired back, 'That wouldn't be fair! I have worked really hard for my grades! I've invested a lot of time, and a lot of hard work! Audrey has done next to nothing toward her degree. She played while I worked my tail off!' The father slowly smiled, winked and said gently, 'Welcome to the Republican Party' | | | |
| | Protofish
Posts:252


 | | 09/04/2008 6:08 PM |
Alert | epic fail | | | |
|
| | asugrl
Posts:723

 | | 09/04/2008 10:39 PM |
Alert | | Lol, sad, but true. | | | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/05/2008 5:47 PM |
Alert | very bad analogy. i believe taxes should definately be used to BETTER our society. we are the richest nation on the planet, but we shun the poor&dont care about those who are less fortunate. here is a ??? for asugrl&JL, so if you are against taxes so much why dont you have a problem paying for MY police protection, MY fire protection in the form of the FD, MY kids education, MY families recreation, MY families national defense in the form of the military etc etc etc. these are all SOCIALIST programs, are they bad? cuz i never hear anyone ranting against them. why not have the goverment be the financial backing for health care instead of big insurance? at least then we will know that the peoples healthcare is actually the priority vs CEO bonuses&stockholder profits like it is now. do you realize there have been american deaths caused by ins companys refusing to authorize life saving procedures, instead basically saying that a life has a price tag on it? bet if it was your SO you would sing a different tune. look what the last 30 yrs of a hands off approach by the goverment has wrought us, record gas prices&record gas profits for big oil, record profits&record numbers of uninsured by big insurance. why is that, and why as americans should we sit around and say that is acceptable?
also answer me this, why can france&other countries have much better healthcare&quality of life than americans? why do workers there get mandate 4 weeks time off minimun? why are there mandated sick time hours for their workers? honestly is there a real reason this cant happen here? it cant until big corporations&big business get their tentacles off washington, until americans are united maybe not ideologically, but they can be united in the thought that we all deserve a quality of life on par with nations far smaller than our own. just my 2 cents.. | | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | cholo bandito
Posts:926

 | | 09/05/2008 6:09 PM |
Alert | Yeah, France is a global super power.......... sure | |
I think the concept of god has outlived its usefulness. It is time to put it out of its misery. | |
|
| | Java Lover
Posts:170


 | | 09/05/2008 6:21 PM |
Alert | Riki,
I will have to read your post again when my eyes are bothering me. I just can't get through what seem to be run-on sentences.
I did get your first statement. I really don't think it was a bad analogy. Why should I work so hard for those who would rather party, not work, and then reward them for it?
I'm not talking about those who cannot do for themselves.
Are you really comparing the U.S. to France? I'll take the the U.S.A any day over France. | | | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/05/2008 6:23 PM |
Alert | thats the FREAKIN POINT!!!!! france isnt a superpower but they can provide all the things i mentioned, yet we cant? there is no reason we cant. ask yourself how your life would be if you knew your employer was mandated to give vacation time, mandated to give sick time etc etc. in france, they have government backed daycare facilities, their kids college education is paid for, he...ll they even have nannys that work for the government to assist new moms&families when a baby is born. its not so much that government is involved that appeals to me, its the fact that governments there understand the bigger picture. they understand with so many people employed, that everyone contributes&profit isnt the motivation but the end result for everyone when they work together. think about it, less $$$ spent on daycare means more spending power which means more jobs.
like i mentioned, there are some people who need a helping hand and thats where welfare comes in. its shouldnt be an end all for people, but a beginning for a better life. for instance, we need forests cleared of old growth to help lower the chance of devastating fires, why not offer the man or woman down on her luck a helping hand in exchange for becoming a trained worker capable of removing the fire hazard&helping keep our forests clean&safe? same could be said for river,lake,stream&ocean pollutants, we could mobilize our down&out citizens with an opportunity to start anew in exchange for a helping hand lifting them up to a contributing level, one in which they can be proud to serve&a country that is proud to help. what is so bad about that exactly? | | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | cholo bandito
Posts:926

 | | 09/05/2008 6:31 PM |
Alert | Because welfare people like getting money-for-nothing. They don't want to work. THAT'S why they are on welfare. There are plenty of jobs to be had, but they choose free money, instead. | |
I think the concept of god has outlived its usefulness. It is time to put it out of its misery. | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/05/2008 6:33 PM |
Alert | ooohhh so i have run on sentences, i must be retarded or something *rolls eyes* . you didnt answer any of my questions, and i actually pointed out why we should help everyone in our country rather than just let everyone fend for themselves.
would i take the french lifestyle vs the american counterpart? yes i would. at least there i would know my goverment works for me¬ vice versa. there i know i dont have religious radicals trying to legislate my body or what i can or cant do with my personal life&try to shove their morals down my throat. there i know my familys health&well being actually matter to the goverment instead of me being used as a pawn to make fat cats richer, there i know goverment&society is forward thinking enough to recognize higher educated people benefit everyone instead of the disparity we have right now&dont think thats an accident btw. there are people who WANT the current gulf between haves&have nots to continue and unfortunately our government plays right into their hands.
there, how about some more run on sentences for ya 
btw you think our current political system truly is working for the american people&actually cares about their well being? its pretty obvious they dont
| | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/05/2008 6:36 PM |
Alert | oh yeah lots of jobs, so the 600k americans out of work right now should have no problem finding work? or if they do, is it enough to keep their homes, pay for their kids college, save $$ for the future etc etc etc? probably not.
like i mentioned, welfare is not a solution for those less fortunate, we need to make a binding agreement between government and those receiving help saying they will in turn help society that has helped them. whats wrong with that? if they dont agree, then they dont get welfare, simple enough | | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | corman
Posts:1383


 | | 09/05/2008 7:48 PM |
Alert | rikimaru..........since you are so in love with France........why are you here in Maricopa? AND, by the way......since you are such a France "booster", and you probably have friends in France....why don't you get France to pay some of the outstanding debts that they owe the US.. Why don't you discuss this fact in some of your diatribes?????
It is deplorable the amount of money that France owes us..........
I am not sure where you went to school, but they short changed your education on proper sentance structure, grammer and education. Your posts are amusing and downright funny at times, and I really enjoy "trying" to make sense of them. Here in the US, you have that right, and a lot of Americans died in France for you to have that right.....
Keep smiling and "HAVE A NICE DAY"......
| | | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1011


 | | 09/05/2008 8:30 PM |
Alert | Posted By *rikimaru* on 09/05/2008 5:47 PM
very bad analogy. i believe taxes should definately be used to BETTER our society. we are the richest nation on the planet, but we shun the poor&dont care about those who are less fortunate. here is a ??? for asugrl&JL, so if you are against taxes so much why dont you have a problem paying for MY police protection, MY fire protection in the form of the FD, MY kids education, MY families recreation, MY families national defense in the form of the military etc etc etc. these are all SOCIALIST programs, are they bad? cuz i never hear anyone ranting against them. why not have the goverment be the financial backing for health care instead of big insurance? at least then we will know that the peoples healthcare is actually the priority vs CEO bonuses&stockholder profits like it is now. do you realize there have been american deaths caused by ins companys refusing to authorize life saving procedures, instead basically saying that a life has a price tag on it? bet if it was your SO you would sing a different tune. look what the last 30 yrs of a hands off approach by the goverment has wrought us, record gas prices&record gas profits for big oil, record profits&record numbers of uninsured by big insurance. why is that, and why as americans should we sit around and say that is acceptable?
also answer me this, why can france&other countries have much better healthcare&quality of life than americans? why do workers there get mandate 4 weeks time off minimun? why are there mandated sick time hours for their workers? honestly is there a real reason this cant happen here? it cant until big corporations&big business get their tentacles off washington, until americans are united maybe not ideologically, but they can be united in the thought that we all deserve a quality of life on par with nations far smaller than our own. just my 2 cents.. You really should make sure that you know the meaning of words prior to using them. Socialism is a political-economic theory that calls for the government ownership or control of the means of production and distribution of goods. Areas such as education, fire protection, and national defense are function of all modern governments, and have nothing to do with the production and distribution of goods. If you are advocating socialism, you only need to look at the USSR, Eastern Europe ,and North Korea to see how well such a system works. I should say worked, as all those countries (except starving North Korea) abandoned the system when it proved bankrupt. AS to France - since the 1970s it has been faced with chronic unemployment of about 10% (double that of the US). Most economist blame that high rate on the generous benefits you describe. Employees are just too expensive, so businesses would rather be short-handed than hire additional staff that are almost impossible to lay off during a slow down. An interesting comparison between the economies of the US and France is each countries per capita GNI (the amount of income per person produced in a country). The US $46,040, France $38,500. The numbers speak for themselves. | | | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/05/2008 9:36 PM |
Alert | france's unemployment rate as of 2007 is 7.50 percent, higher than here but not as high as you say. i said our police,fire,military,education are socialist programs meaning goverment both local&national, run these institutions funded by taxes.i believe manufacturing&distributing goods is part of socialism, but its also a form of goverment. i may be wrong, i dont profess to be an expert.
so no one has still answered my questions as to why these things i brought up are not possible in the united states of america? | | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | JasonY
Posts:3446


 | | 09/06/2008 6:54 AM |
Alert | hastings, love ya, but you didn't mention that communism and socialism are two different things (though related). There are also many forms of communism, which is what most the countries you mentioned practice. And China is doing quite well economically with their government. I don't approve of it or like it, but just look at how much Chinese made products we import.
Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production and property in general.
Socialism is the politico-economic theory of social organization advocating that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be regulated or owned by the community. The community could be government or the people themselves. | | "My favorite health club is the International House of Pancakes" -- Lewis Black | |
|
| | asugrl
Posts:723

 | | 09/06/2008 3:06 PM |
Alert | Posted By *rikimaru* on 09/05/2008 6:33 PM
ooohhh so i have run on sentences, i must be retarded or something *rolls eyes* . you didnt answer any of my questions, and i actually pointed out why we should help everyone in our country rather than just let everyone fend for themselves.
No seriously, I never read your entire posts because your run-on sentences, zero facts, and your penchant for your posts being all over the place really give me a headache. | | | |
|
| | *rikimaru*
Posts:497


 | | 09/06/2008 5:01 PM |
Alert | well if you had to listen to right wing nonsense like i do everyday, then you would go off on a tangent¬ really pay enough attention to paragraphs&phrasing of viewpoints either 
ok, so ASUGRL&JL, please explain why ranking 37th in the world as far as health rankings go is acceptable for you or any american? we shouldnt expect more from our health care industry&leaders in washington?
@asugrl, is it me that gives you a headache of the fact that real change to not only our political system, but also our society as a whole is happening right before our eyes? Barack is going to win this election and honestly i just want whats best for everyone in the country whether it be republican, democrat or independent. enough of the personal attacks, they distract us from the bigger picture. | | listened for, they cannot be heard;looked for, they cannot be seen; felt for, they cannot be touched: old ninja proverb | |
|
| | drummer72
Posts:3886


 | | 09/06/2008 5:17 PM |
Alert | OMG what a lame a$$ analogy.
That's like saying, this guy got run over by a car. Let's be democratic and all get run over by a car. | | "Everything for everyone and nothing for ourselves" | |
|
| | asugrl
Posts:723

 | | 09/07/2008 1:06 PM |
Alert | Posted By *rikimaru* on 09/06/2008 5:01 PM
@asugrl, is it me that gives you a headache of the fact that real change to not only our political system, but also our society as a whole is happening right before our eyes? This is not a viable sentence. Also, I have to listen to left-wing conspiracy theories often, yet I can still write clearly. In fact, I do it for a living; some people have skills like that. | | | |
|
| | drummer72
Posts:3886


 | | 09/07/2008 6:57 PM |
Alert | Posted By asugrl on 09/07/2008 1:06 PM Posted By *rikimaru* on 09/06/2008 5:01 PM
@asugrl, is it me that gives you a headache of the fact that real change to not only our political system, but also our society as a whole is happening right before our eyes? This is not a viable sentence. Also, I have to listen to left-wing conspiracy theories often, yet I can still write clearly. In fact, I do it for a living; some people have skills like that.
The idea is to get our points across. What's with all this "oh, I'm better than you when it comes to writing junk?" If you can understand what one is trying to say, that should be enough. But, then you run across people like azcarrier and he makes no sense at all. | | "Everything for everyone and nothing for ourselves" | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1011


 | | 09/07/2008 8:58 PM |
Alert | Posted By Jason on 09/06/2008 6:54 AM hastings, love ya, but you didn't mention that communism and socialism are two different things (though related). There are also many forms of communism, which is what most the countries you mentioned practice. And China is doing quite well economically with their government. I don't approve of it or like it, but just look at how much Chinese made products we import.
Communism is a socioeconomic structure that promotes the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership of the means of production and property in general.
Socialism is the politico-economic theory of social organization advocating that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be regulated or owned by the community. The community could be government or the people themselves. If you study the history of China over the past few decades, you will find that its economy only took off when they gave up on strict socialism and allowed people a greater degree of economic freedom. It has been capitalism that has enabled China's economy to grow so greatly in recent years. Socialism kept their economy in shackles for decades. They still call themselves a socialist state but that is only so the Communist party can keep its dictatorial control. In practice, the primary differences between European socialism and communism as it was practiced by the USSR and its Eastern European satellites were two fold. The first difference was political. Communist states set up dictatorships (some might say oligarchies) to run the socialist economic system. In Western Europe democratic governments were maintained. The second difference was the degree of government control over business and industry (when people euphemistically talk about common ownership or community ownership, a more honest description would be government ownership). Communist states took direct ownership of almost everything. Socialist governments allow various degrees of private ownership but under a high level of government regulation. If you read your above definitions carefully, you will note that they are almost interchangeable. That is why Russia became The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, not The Union of Soviet Communist Republics. | | | |
|
| |
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.6 |
|
|
|