Fair
68°F
High: 79°F
Low: 47°F
Currently : Partly Cloudy
22 Nov 2008
> Five-day forecast
 Search
   
 
   

Business Directory
Add your Business
Coupons
Add your Coupon
Classifieds
Add Your Classified
Subject: Annexation challenged
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Page 8 of 8 << < 12345678
AuthorMessages
mrwonderfulUser is Offline

Posts:276

07/26/2008 6:33 AM Alert 

*--*  Boy it will be nice when these windy city folks get done with their goings on about this annexation problem.  Is anyone privy to how  long the legal loop takes to get a day in court?   I wouldn't miss this day for all the money in china.  Chessman I'll bring two bags of popcorn (1carmal and the other plain) you bring the sweet tea.   lollol

*--*User is Offline

Posts:33

07/26/2008 8:16 AM Alert 
Posted By mrwonderful on 07/26/2008 6:33 AM

*--*  Boy it will be nice when these windy city folks get done with their goings on about this annexation problem.  Is anyone privy to how  long the legal loop takes to get a day in court?   I wouldn't miss this day for all the money in china.  Chessman I'll bring two bags of popcorn (1carmal and the other plain) you bring the sweet tea.   lollol

mrwonderful - is this so you can have your airport expedited as you stated on another thread, that I brought to the attention of this thread as well? 

Let me remind all of the quoted post of mrwonderful's from the Politics forum.   Obviously he has left the CAA and came to the side of wanting annexation so the City has room to build an airport for him.

Subject: Councilmen Diedrich & Brown lack strategic vision
07/18/2008 7:52 PM
mrwonderful
"Well citizens I feel the airport is needed immediately, I drive from pinal county to Cutter Aviation at Sky Harbor and am tired of doing so. Please expidite the completion ASAP I would like to have the first hanger space available, I will even build a multi unit hanger for my plane plus any other users."

Once again, enough wasting time on repeating and good luck in court CAA.

mrwonderfulUser is Offline

Posts:276

07/27/2008 8:11 AM Alert 

Again  *--* you failed to understand my post stating " I feel any city owned properties and the airport are viable candidates for annexation.  Not this grab and run with the tax dollars scheme.  After hearing Chessman"s meeting with Will Dunn and Amy Haber-Bosch, how can anyone even consider any measure with that discusting attitude.  I guess the best result is they no longer in a position to do destruction to the Farms. 

 

 

King and Queen of Lies

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 8 of 8 << < 12345678

Forums > General Discussion > General Chat > Annexation challenged



ActiveForums 3.6