 |
Business Directory |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Coupons |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Classifieds |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| | Author | Messages | |
sdmphx777
Posts:0

 | | | missPolitick
Posts:645


 | | 03/10/2008 11:20 AM |
Alert | | It's people like that chick that force mama's boys to stay in the closet, marry women, have children, and then when they're having a mid-life crisis finally come out of the closet and destroy everyone's lives. If people could live and let live, gay kids wouldn't turn out so screwed up in the head. (Not all of them are, just the ones who were told they're going to hell.) I really feel sorry for what gay people have to endure throughout their life. They didn't ask for that burden. | | Despite All My Rage I Am Still Just A Rat In A Cage | |
|
| | sdmphx777
Posts:0

 | | 03/10/2008 11:38 AM |
Alert | Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden. | | | |
|
| | caveman
Posts:1235


 | | 03/10/2008 12:38 PM |
Alert | | We are scared of religious fanatics in Iran and look at the fanatics we have here at home. The hate this woman is spewing is horrible. I am with missPolitick on this one. | | | |
|
| | missPolitick
Posts:645


 | | 03/10/2008 6:04 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/10/2008 11:38 AM
Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden. I believe you're born that way. | | Despite All My Rage I Am Still Just A Rat In A Cage | |
|
| | Amygdala
Posts:67

 | | 03/10/2008 6:39 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/10/2008 11:38 AM Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden.
I believe you're born that way.
Yep, he was born that way. | | | |
|
| | drummer72
Posts:3886


 | | 03/10/2008 7:59 PM |
Alert | | Someone should shoot her. | | "Everything for everyone and nothing for ourselves" | |
|
| | LampLiteSniper
Posts:463


 | | 03/11/2008 7:39 AM |
Alert | | Haha good video, gay terrorists, first they kill you then they rear end you! | | | |
|
| | missPolitick
Posts:645


 | | 03/11/2008 7:48 AM |
Alert | | They're indoctrinating our 2 YR. OLDS in?? They're infiltrating the city councils?? Sounds like aliens. She makes me sick. I'm glad I moved away from a town where most of the people share her views. | | Despite All My Rage I Am Still Just A Rat In A Cage | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1004


 | | 03/11/2008 11:05 AM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/10/2008 11:38 AM
Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden. As a conservative , I assume that by "right wingers" you are referring to me and those who think like me. You also seem not to know as much about us as you think you do. When you state that we think that sexual orientation is a choice you are making a fallacious generalization. I, and a number of my conservative friends, think that sexual orientation is most likely a matter of chemistry and it's effect on the fetus. As a matter of historical fact however, this was not always so. For example ,if you do a little reading about Classical Greece, you will find that homosexuality was an accepted social norm in many segments of the population. In that case it was not due to chemistry but rather to societal expectations and tradition. Other examples of choice would include ships in the days of sail, and prisons today. The point that I am trying to make is that those who try to find a a one size fits all explanation for homosexuality are engaging in an exercise in futility. Far too many variables must be considered, starting with time, place, and circumstance. | | | |
|
| | LampLiteSniper
Posts:463


 | | 03/11/2008 11:46 AM |
Alert | | Bin Laden has not ever molested anyone anus. | | | |
|
| | sdmphx777
Posts:0

 | | 03/11/2008 1:51 PM |
Alert | Posted By hastings1066 on 03/11/2008 11:05 AM Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/10/2008 11:38 AM
Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden. As a conservative , I assume that by "right wingers" you are referring to me and those who think like me. You also seem not to know as much about us as you think you do. When you state that we think that sexual orientation is a choice you are making a fallacious generalization. I, and a number of my conservative friends, think that sexual orientation is most likely a matter of chemistry and it's effect on the fetus. As a matter of historical fact however, this was not always so. For example ,if you do a little reading about Classical Greece, you will find that homosexuality was an accepted social norm in many segments of the population. In that case it was not due to chemistry but rather to societal expectations and tradition. Other examples of choice would include ships in the days of sail, and prisons today. The point that I am trying to make is that those who try to find a a one size fits all explanation for homosexuality are engaging in an exercise in futility. Far too many variables must be considered, starting with time, place, and circumstance.
1. How many gay friends do you have? What do they say?
2. How much research have you done or schooling have you had on this matter? Are you a psychiatrist or psychologist? Do you realize you contradict yourself? First you say it is "chemistry" then you say in Ancient Greece it was accepted so people turned gay. How much research has been done to determine the cause of homosexuality in Ancient Greece? None. Research studies weren't conducted on this in Ancient Greece. They are for today however. Prison? You can't compare the prison population to that of society. Most prisoners are deviant in some manner and many of a sexual nature. Hollywood also tends to sensationalize this which leads to misconceptions. Do some research and make sure you look at what Dr's found when researching the hypothalamus. | | | |
|
| | GilaGuy
Posts:789


 | | 03/11/2008 2:43 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/11/2008 1:51 PM Do some research and make sure you look at what Dr's found when researching the hypothalamus. You may want to do the same thing. The hypothalamus research was conducted by Simon Levay, who found a size difference in a specific area of neurons carried by heterosexual vs homosexual men. His evidence purported to show that heterosexual females and homosexual males had very similar sizes of these hypothalamutic neurons. However, there were disparities in his results...several members of the control group had neuron bundles that were widely divergent from what would have been expected given his earlier findings, and several of the homosexual men had neuron bundles that were the same as the heterosexual men. These results were enough to convince others that more study was necessary. So several years later, a team led by Bill Byne tried to replicate the results. They couldn't. Their results showed that while there was a difference in the hypothalamutic neuron bundle between men the male and female groups, there wasn't a statistical difference between the homosexual and heterosexual subjects. The team then went a step further, by both counting the bundles of nuerons and measuring their mass. Done both ways, the result was the same. There was a wide difference between the male and female groups, but the homosexual group was not statistically dissimilar from either. So what was learned? There is a male and female difference in the hypothalamus that is incontrovertible. The same cannot be said for a difference between homosexual and heterosexual subjects. There may be some other biological predisposition that isn't yet discovered. But this one ain't it. | | | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1004


 | | 03/11/2008 4:00 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/11/2008 1:51 PM Posted By hastings1066 on 03/11/2008 11:05 AM Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/10/2008 11:38 AM
Well according to the right wingers it's a choice...I guess they all disagree with research done by doctors and researchers. And if you try to tell them that they'll say the doctors have an agenda so they cook the data.
If they use this Reps reasoning I guess Larry Craig and Gary Condit are worse threats than bin Laden. As a conservative , I assume that by "right wingers" you are referring to me and those who think like me. You also seem not to know as much about us as you think you do. When you state that we think that sexual orientation is a choice you are making a fallacious generalization. I, and a number of my conservative friends, think that sexual orientation is most likely a matter of chemistry and it's effect on the fetus. As a matter of historical fact however, this was not always so. For example ,if you do a little reading about Classical Greece, you will find that homosexuality was an accepted social norm in many segments of the population. In that case it was not due to chemistry but rather to societal expectations and tradition. Other examples of choice would include ships in the days of sail, and prisons today. The point that I am trying to make is that those who try to find a a one size fits all explanation for homosexuality are engaging in an exercise in futility. Far too many variables must be considered, starting with time, place, and circumstance.
1. How many gay friends do you have? What do they say?
2. How much research have you done or schooling have you had on this matter? Are you a psychiatrist or psychologist? Do you realize you contradict yourself? First you say it is "chemistry" then you say in Ancient Greece it was accepted so people turned gay. How much research has been done to determine the cause of homosexuality in Ancient Greece? None. Research studies weren't conducted on this in Ancient Greece. They are for today however. Prison? You can't compare the prison population to that of society. Most prisoners are deviant in some manner and many of a sexual nature. Hollywood also tends to sensationalize this which leads to misconceptions. Do some research and make sure you look at what Dr's found when researching the hypothalamus. ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS 1 - I do not know how many of my friends are gay. It is none of my business and I do not care. 2 - have a masters in history, with a concentration in ancient and medieval history. Which, I think , when added to 30 years of teaching and studying the subject lends more credence to my statements about Classical Greek society than that given to someone who is just voicing an opinion not based on empirical knowledge.
3 - I did not contradict myself. Re- read my last paragraph. In that paragraph I stress that there is no one explanation for homosexual activity. In some cases it could be inborn (perhaps due to chemistry) in other cases the historical record makes it plain that the cause was, at least in part, societal or situational. History has taught us that those who adhere to a theory of absolutism regarding any human activity are committing a cardinal error. Facts are pesky things,they will not go away, no matter how strongly one voices his opinions. 4 - If you want to continue a serious discussion on the subject as it relates to ancient Greece I would be willing to do so, if you would first read some books on the subject. I recommend Will and Ariel Durant's eleven volume Story of Western Civilization (volume II The Life of Greece). I ask you to become educated on the subject because I am interested in facts, not opinions. | | | |
|
| | sdmphx777
Posts:0

 | | 03/11/2008 5:47 PM |
Alert | Hastings. Show me empirical research that shows that ancient Greeks were homosexual because of environment and not because of biological factors. I don't care how much history you have taught or studied about this...this data does not exist because these studies were never performed. My point was not to debate ancient Greece. I believe that you are an expert on the subject. This information about why they were gay is theoretical at best and without scientific proof. I'm sure Gilaguy would like to debate though. He seems to be able to do research in Wikipedia which makes him an expert at everything.
I don't buy that you don't know how many of your friends are gay. All this tells me is the answer is 0. I'm not saying it is good or bad but if you ask a homosexual they'll tell you they were born that way.
Gilaguy you can't look at 2 contrasting viewpoints or theories and discount 1 of them based on this. Instead of passing yourself off as an expert on everything why don't you just source where your information came from, i.e. Google, Yahoo, Wikipedia. I'm not going to debate you on statistics or statistical analysis or scientific theory. I spend my entire day, everyday, researching data, studying trends, and interpreting data. Why don't you spend your time doing your own research and publish a study on it. Just remember to give credit to your sources. | | | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1004


 | | 03/11/2008 7:05 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmphx777 on 03/11/2008 5:47 PM
Hastings. Show me empirical research that shows that ancient Greeks were homosexual because of environment and not because of biological factors. I don't care how much history you have taught or studied about this...this data does not exist because these studies were never performed. My point was not to debate ancient Greece. I believe that you are an expert on the subject. This information about why they were gay is theoretical at best and without scientific proof. I'm sure Gilaguy would like to debate though. He seems to be able to do research in Wikipedia which makes him an expert at everything.
I don't buy that you don't know how many of your friends are gay. All this tells me is the answer is 0. I'm not saying it is good or bad but if you ask a homosexual they'll tell you they were born that way.
Gilaguy you can't look at 2 contrasting viewpoints or theories and discount 1 of them based on this. Instead of passing yourself off as an expert on everything why don't you just source where your information came from, i.e. Google, Yahoo, Wikipedia. I'm not going to debate you on statistics or statistical analysis or scientific theory. I spend my entire day, everyday, researching data, studying trends, and interpreting data. Why don't you spend your time doing your own research and publish a study on it. Just remember to give credit to your sources.
The fact that you do not "buy" the idea that I do not know if any of my friends are gay, says more about you than it does about me. I do not concern myself with the sexual orientation of people I meet. It is none of my business and as far as I am concerned irrelevant.Apparently it matters to you but you should be cautious of projecting your attitude on others. just because such things are important to you does not mean that they are important to others, they certainly are not to me. As to your other point (reason for widespread homosexual activity in classical Greece), you are accurate when you say that no scientific studies were made on the subject, but at some time common-sense and Occam's Razor have to be applied. For centuries it was a common practice and socially accepted and expected for a young upper class Greek male to be taken under the wing of an older male and "shown the ropes", so to speak. This relationship would continue for years, sometimes for life. At the same time both men would maintain a heterosexual life style at home, with a wife and family. Logic and that pesky Occam's Razor, tells us that it is unlikely that such a large percentage of the male population was truly homosexual. A much more likely explanation is that a small percentage were born homosexual (probably the same percentage as today), and the rest engaged in the behavior as a part of socialization in that culture, at that time. When, over time, the attitudes changed, so did the activity. | | | |
|
| | Jason
Posts:3378


 | | 03/12/2008 10:24 AM |
Alert | Show me empirical research that shows that ancient Greeks were homosexual because of environment and not because of biological factors.
It cuts both ways. If we're going to say that homosexual men live lives like heterosexuals (and they do) then it is rather contradictory to say that heterosexual men wouldn't live homosexual lives, given the correct cultural structure. Hastings has done the research I'm sure (see the post above mine) so you really don't have a leg to stand on.Besides which, your thread title is all wrong. This is not a national issue, this is the voice of one person. It's rather bigoted of you to paint the entire GOP, conservatives and Christians the same way.  | | Joined: Jul 2005 | |
|
| | sdmphx777
Posts:0

 | | 03/12/2008 2:00 PM |
Alert | Posted By Jason on 03/12/2008 10:24 AM Show me empirical research that shows that ancient Greeks were homosexual because of environment and not because of biological factors.
It cuts both ways. If we're going to say that homosexual men live lives like heterosexuals (and they do) then it is rather contradictory to say that heterosexual men wouldn't live homosexual lives, given the correct cultural structure. Hastings has done the research I'm sure (see the post above mine) so you really don't have a leg to stand on. Besides which, your thread title is all wrong. This is not a national issue, this is the voice of one person. It's rather bigoted of you to paint the entire GOP, conservatives and Christians the same way.  If Hastings can show me a study or research he's done that shows this empirically I'll eat crow. Also show me a church that is for gay marriage...are you? | | | |
|
| | GilaGuy
Posts:789


 | | 03/12/2008 2:12 PM |
Alert | Posted By sdmpxh777 on 03/11/2008 5:47 PM
Gilaguy you can't look at 2 contrasting viewpoints or theories and discount 1 of them based on this. Instead of passing yourself off as an expert on everything why don't you just source where your information came from, i.e. Google, Yahoo, Wikipedia. I'm not going to debate you on statistics or statistical analysis or scientific theory. I spend my entire day, everyday, researching data, studying trends, and interpreting data. Why don't you spend your time doing your own research and publish a study on it. Just remember to give credit to your sources. First off, I don't recall any particular location where I have ever claimed to be an "expert" on anything. I know what I know, I study what I study, and that's as far as it goes. I am glad to hear that you spend all day every day researching data...are you an analyst? Or a student? The information I posted above was derived from classroom learning, which is no doubt something you're familiar with. If you'd like to know more, I provided names of the folks who conducted the actual studies (hence, my sources) and you are free to look further into their studies (as I did) and see for yourself. There aren't 2 viewpoints, dear, there are two clearly contrasting results which came about in different studies. The fact that two subsequent studies failed in their attempts to duplicate the initial results should tell you what you need to know. But you don't want to hear that. Why? Because you've made up your mind. And in your mind, it is only the opinion that matters...not fact or empirical evidence to the contrary. A closed mind is a dangerous thing. | | | |
|
| | hastings1066
Posts:1004


 | | 03/13/2008 12:39 PM |
Alert | Also show me a church that is for gay marriage...are you? ******************************************************************************** Why not,let gays be as miserable as the rest of us. OUCH! My wife just hit me. | | | |
|
| |
| | You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
| |
ActiveForums 3.6 |
|
|
|