Posted By alanf on 03/10/2008 7:30 AM I'm sorry missPolitick, but that has to be one of the silliest things you've said on here. There is absolutely ZERO relevance between cigarette smoking and texting in a vehicle. When was the last time you saw a smoker staring at their cigarette instead of the road? If somebody is stupid enough to text while they drive, they'll be stupid enough to try and pick it up if they drop it. Go easy on her, she has a point. Cigarettes have to come from somewhere, do they not? The smoker has to reach for the pack, open it up, fumble with it, bang it against their dashboard a few times for good luck, tip it upside down, grab a single cigarette (unless he's just super manly and smokes two at once), find a lighter, employ the lighter, and move the cigarette towards the open flame in a manner sufficient to light it up. Yup. It doesn't happen in a vacuum. I saw someone try this maneuver about two weeks ago while northbound on 347 and I'm still surprised she was able to keep from hitting the Gila River Bridge. If you want to ban inattentiveness while driving, then fine, go for it. But make it evenhanded. Outlaw fumbling with the radio dial, reaching back to soothe a crying child, digging for that map that "was right there a minute ago," fumbling through your purse for some lip gloss, and taking occasional glances at your cellphone to send a message to Uncle Bob. Picking out the topic of the day (currently: texting while driving) for special legislation is a cheap tactic. |